CHAPTER FOUR

 

  TOWARDS AN ADVAITIC VISION

OF THE WORLD

 

 

            Having rather elaborately analyzed Griffiths' advaita , we saw how it is rooted deeply in the whole of reality . In the present chapter, we proceed to deepen these advaitic insights and situate them in the context of his vision of the world. This chapter will be a stepping stone to the next one, where we see the final unifying vision of the whole reality, including matter , humanity and God.

            In this brief chapter, we first view the whole world emerging from and moving to an advaitic union. There will be unavoidable generalizations since we deal with a time span of millions of years in a few pages. Then we shall try to visualize the significance and role of religions in such a world. We proceed first by examining the need to go beyond the materialistic or reductionistic understanding of the world. In trying to value the new advaitic or non-reductionistic understanding of the world, a brief description of the historical progress of art, undertaken by Griffiths himself, enables us to get a deeper perception of the deviations and developments of the whole world. Art can be taken as the reflection primarily of the spiritual dimension of the world. Finally, we try to envision a new world wherein the physical, psychological and spiritual dimensions are respected, whereby the feminine aspect is rediscovered and cherished.

            This leads inevitably to a more noble and deep role for the spiritual or religious dimension in this world. It is Griffiths' contention that there is something basically common and true in all religions. So he seeks the unifying aspects of diverse religions. It might be remembered that he is not at all advocating an assimilation of all religions. In his vision of the future, the different religions, though forming a unifying wholeness, deserve their own sep arate and at the same time related existence. Through dialogue and interaction they can enrich each other and deepen our understanding of the whole reality . This conviction forms the core of his advaitic vision, whereby the spiritual forms the base of the world and spreads to the other dimensions of reality, without in any way searching for uniformity. Authentic unity, in terms of a unitive vision, is the key concern here.

 

 

 

BEYOND MATERIALISTIC PHILOSOPHY

 

            The modern age, which began three centuries ago with the discoveries of Galileo and Newton and which resulted in the gradual development of the materialist philosophy and the mechanistic model of the universe, is almost coming to an end. In the course of the three centuries, the modern age has affected every conceivable part of our society and left deep scars in all dimensions of our existence. Griffiths traces the roots of the present industrial and technological culture to the mechanistic concept of modern society. The whole political, social and economic systems of the West are governed by this model. He affirms that "even art, morality and religion are affected by it."428 So we encounter today the modern technological world which came into existence three centuries ago and which has come to such a pre-eminent position of power only in the last century.

 

Beyond Reductionism

 

            The materialistic philosophy , which is the basis of so-called modern thinking and life style, needs further clarification. We give a very generalized analysis here of the reductionist tendencies in every sphere of human experience even risking over-simplification. Materialism , which was present in Marxism as a crude philosophy, grew and refined itself to become implicit and "practically everywhere," governing "people's attitudes of mind and behavior."429 This materialism cannot be studied without understanding reductionism, which forms one of its inherent constituents. As the name implies reductionism reduces "everything to certain material principles and to its material base."430 Griffiths gives a simple case of reductionism in music. According to the reductionist principle, all music could be reduced to vibrations on strings or in a pipe. In other words, music is vibrations in the air or in any other proper medium. So from a reductionist perspective, music could be considered as vibrations, without any concern for aesthetic sense or ecstatic experience .

            Such a mechanistic system has come to dominate every aspect not only of science, but also of our practical life, as is shown by Fritjof Capra in his The Turning Point (1982). Capra shows how modern physics was at first an attempt to explain everything in terms of atoms, whereby everything could be reduced to material particles that obeyed certain fixed mechanistic laws and could be verified and calculated using mathematical formulae. In this way all reality came to be reduced to a big machine. This trend expanded beyond science and conquered history, psychology and even spirituality .

            This method continues today in biology, which seeks to explain life in terms of physics and chemistry, leading to the belief that human beings are simply more complicated machines.431 In medicine, which has more profound practical implications for us, the human body is seen from a biological point of view as a mechanical system obeying certain physical and chemical laws. So the body is to be treated as a physical entity and (even) manipulated by genetic engineering, without relation to the psyche and spiritual dimension s of the human person .432 Here the integral aspect of human life is not at all taken seriously.

            In psychology too there are many methods which are conspicuously reductionist, even though psychology is less amenable to it. Behaviorism, for example, is a serious attempt to reduce the entire human psyche to the level of a machine by analyzing it only in terms of external, observable behavior. Another typical example is psychoanalysis founded and employed extensively by Sigmund Freud, where he tries to explain the whole human personality in the light of the unconscious, seen in terms of the mechanical models of repressed appetites, instincts and desires. According to Freudian psychology, all the higher forms of consciousness , the motives of the heart, morality and even religion, are explained and explained away in terms of the unconscious. Such a phenomenon is typical of the reductionist method. It is an attempt to explain the higher in terms of the lower and to reduce the higher to the lower in order to come even to the absurd conclusion, for instance, that religion could be regarded as repressed sex .

            Coming to sociology, attempts are made to reduce society to individuals, who can either organize themselves in a society or who are at liberty to seek their own advantage. It is from these two such interpretations that capitalism and communism emerge. In both these systems, society is reduced to a multitude of individuals. In economics, where the whole aim is to understand the society in terms of production and distribution, the reductionism is obvious. In Marxism the social structure is deliberately reduced to its economic basis, conceived as determining the whole. In capitalism, on the other hand, the society is understood in terms of monetary values, so that the prosperity of a society is measured in terms of its gross national product, by the money which is being circulated in it and the way it is being used.

            Such a mechanistic system, which drastically reduces everything to its materialistic basis, Griffiths admits, has had extraordinary success.433 It is functional and successful at this particular level. Scientifically, it has led to great discoveries and produced the marvelous and impressive technology. Socially, it has produced political states with tremendous power and with influence over the whole world. The negative effects of such progress are also obvious. Griffiths mentions some of them: "rapidly exhausting material resources, polluting the environment and leading to the building up of armaments which threaten a nuclear war capable of destroying our entire civilization and the whole planet."434 According to our author, these evil effects are directly caused by the last three centuries of materialistic and reductionist thinking.

            Unfortunately, Griffiths did not live to experience the worst case of reductionism, that of life itself. The sociobiology which reduces life itself to genes and human motives to the "selfish genes."435 The same theoretical principle is implied in the successful Human Genome Project .436 The preunderstanding is that life can be digitally reduced to genes and by genetic manipulation life can be fostered or hampered.

 

TOWARDS A NEW VISION OF THE WORLD

 

Rediscovery of the Perennial Advaitic Philosophy

 

            Griffiths discerns a new trend away from modernity, beginning in the second part of this century. In this movement, in which we are all involved, the above mentioned materialistic trends are waning. In his words, "[W]e are beginning now to be able to replace the mechanistic systems and mechanistic model of the universe with an organic model. This is the beginning of a return to the traditional wisdom, the wisdom by which human beings have lived over thousands of years and with which the great societies of the past have been built up."437 In this traditional wisdom, to which Griffiths often refers, there is always a threefold universe, consisting not just of the physical dimension of the materialistic culture , but also the psychological and the spiritual dimension s. It is clear for him that "the body experiences the physical world, the soul (psyche) the psychological; the spirit alone has the capacity to contemplate God. It is here that God's spirit acts within the human being and where we become aware of our identity as children of God."438 These three dimensions are seen always as interrelated and interdependent. This advaitic understanding , we may claim, is for him the essence of perennial philosophy .

            The rational and logical mind has analyzed matter and has organized the material to such a refinement that many of our wants are already met and it is further hoped that all human needs will be satisfied. Hence, many people consider our age to be a development over the previous ones. But Griffiths reminds us that it is only in this particular respect (of scientific and rational level) that our age is a development over the earlier ones. He adds, further, that in other respects, this age is to be judged as being far below the previous ones. He quotes Coomaraswami's understandably exaggerated statement, "From the stone age to the twentieth century, what a descent!"439 Griffiths explains this situation in terms of the perennial philosophy , which was present in the Stone Age as well as in previous ages, and in those days human beings lived by that philosophy . According to this view, there was an order in nature, between the physical world, the psychological, social world and finally the highest divine or spiritual world. All these were seen to be interdependent and integrated. In order to substantiate his claim, Griffiths insightfully, though only briefly, compares the stages of growth in the development of art.440 

 

A Brief Case Study: The Development of Art

 

            Griffiths treats art as a typical case of human inventiveness and studies its historical development to point out some salient features of our present civilization. He does not at all claim that he gives a comprehensive historical development of art. All that he does is to trace the evolving growth of the sacredness in art and see how it is lost in recent times. His main preoccupation is to give a bird's eye view of the relation between the sacred and the artistic and not at all to give a scientific account of the evolution of art in the course of the aeons.

            Starting from the Stone Age, even at the risk of over-simplification, Griffiths senses the ancient wisdom of perennial philosophy embodied in each form of human art. In its early stages art has always been an expression of the religious instinct of human beings. Art was in short, a manifestation of the sense of the sacred. Everything in nature was sacred, because it was pervaded by the universal Spirit . Firstly, in the stone age, art, be it in the form of stone implements, pottery, clothing, burial places, roughly carved figures or painting on the Palaeolithic caves, all were inevitably forms of expressing the mystery of the sacredness which pervaded the whole of human life. Ancient wisdom was embodied in every form of art, which was the expression of the religious instinct of the people.

            Further, with the emergence of great civilizations like in Egypt or in Babylon, the temples became the center of civilized life, and art was used to adorn the temple and to provide for human aesthetic needs. At that time, claims Griffiths, even agriculture and pottery were no less sacred than the service in the temples. All these activities were ways of expressing and manifesting the all-pervading mystery .

            With the great awakening that took place in the first millennium, (500AD-1500AD) there was a shift to the mystery of transcendence. It began with the Upani ads, the teachings of Buddha and those of the Hebrew prophets. At this phase the role of art was less conspicuous. The Israelites were forbidden to make any image of their God and early Buddhists had no image of the Buddha. The Hindu temple also had not come into existence. Later as the religions became structured, and with the emphasis on incarnation in Christianity , there was a flowering of art in every form . This was a world-wide phenomenon, to be found in China , India , Persia, Greece and Rome. Athens led the way here, five centuries before Christ, and Greek culture seemed to be responsible even for the growth of Buddhist sculpture. Gradually in all these regions, there came about a wonderful synthesis of art, poetry and philosophy , giving rise to Hindu sculpture and architecture, Buddhist painting and sculpture, Chinese art of every kind and later to the Cathedrals of Europe with their sculpture and stained glass windows and to the painting of icons in Eastern orthodoxy. Here too, art expressed the mystery of religion, the sacred mystery, revealed in the Scriptures and embodied in every form of music, dancing, painting and in the simple articles of daily use. Even Islam , which had initially totally rejected all images, developed a style of architecture of the utmost refinement.

            This period actually saw the great flowering of art and culture , which took place all over the civilized world. After this period the hold of the perennial philosophy with its holistic integral vision began to slacken. True, individual geniuses arose, but the sense of a cosmic vision or a universal whole was gradually lost and art became more and more fragmented and independent. Today, Griffiths claims, we have inherited this fragmented universe and spiritually we are less developed than the sacred universe of the Stone Age.

            As already hinted, the industrial system that emerged in the nineteenth century, marked the death knell of traditional art. Griffiths emphasizes at the same time that a renewal in art is also taking place, which stresses the cosmic vision of the new science and philosophy . Griffiths hopes for a deeper renewal of art, "not merely in the sense of the fine arts, but in all the humble daily expressions of a sense of beauty, which is also a sense of the sacred in human life."441 Therefore, we may look forward to a new birth, another renaissance of art and culture in our age.

            It may be noted that Griffiths has not done full justice to a comprehensive historical evolution of art. It was neither his ambition, nor aim. Within a very limited space, he wanted to show the spiritual basis of art, which he has at least partially succeeded in spite of the oversimplification it involves.

 

PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE

 

            Griffiths anticipates a great advance in humanity. He cautions us at the same time to look back and to learn from the past. "We have to recognize that the summit [of culture and civilization ] was achieved in those centuries before Christ, and that with the coming of Christ the final fulfillment of this experience of ultimate Reality was reached."442 We had the fully integrating perennial philosophy , transcending all and integrating all, with its physical base, the psychological development and the spiritual order of transcendence . The spiritual "that integrates the whole reality "443 has to be given its due importance.

            On the basis of his own experience and reflections, Griffiths gives the general pattern of the dawning of an integrated future. Such emergence could be perceived from our present understanding of the universe and the knowledge that we have from Eastern mysticism and spiritual experience . These patterns may be divided into the physical or material aspects, the psychological or social aspects and finally the spiritual or integrating aspects.

 

 

 

Physical Aspect as the Beginning

 

            Firstly, it is evident that the new human society that is emerging will be based on a new relationship with nature. This relationship will arise from an organic understanding of nature, instead of the current mechanistic understanding of reality that we saw earlier.444 Here we see ourselves as part of the whole physical organism of the universe. Thus a sense of cosmic whole and a way of relating to our earth, as a living being which sustains and nourishes us and for which we have a responsibility, will emerge. This will not only give rise to a new understanding of the environment, but also put an end to the exploitation of nature at every level. The present trend according to which the material resources of the universe are used for the prosperity of relatively few, will be reversed by the new understanding that all are parts of the new universe, of this natural world. This would imply a new attitude towards the earth, the sea and to all creatures in it, as well as to outer space.

            Secondly, the sense of communion with the all encompassing reality will replace our present attempt to dominate the material world. The new understanding of ecology and our greater sensitivity to its realities will revolutionize our understanding of the world. This would lead us to discover a new kind of technology, based on our new understanding of science and on appropriate technology,445 which would answer to the needs of the vast majority of people in our world.

            Such an appropriate technology would build upon the economy of the village, instead of destroying it.446 The basic crafts like spinning, weaving, pottery, carpentry and metal works would be respected, along with gardening and agriculture. Griffiths recalls that all these crafts were evolved in the millennia before Christ, (from roughly fourth millennium onwards) and they represent for him the summit of human achievement and culture . To discard such abilities in favor of the progress of the mechanistic system is for Griffiths simply "to degrade civilization and life."447 

            Respect for these basic crafts enables us to live in harmony with ourselves, with nature and with our surroundings. Art actually expresses this harmony and so is beautiful. Beauty is always a relation of harmony with nature. When we maintain the harmony with nature, our products are not beautiful. If we do not perceive such a respectful harmony with nature, even if our products may be helpful and useful they are not really beautiful.

            Thirdly, these new values would give rise to the emergence of a new type of human society, decentralized and drawing people from larger cities to smaller towns and villages. In such a setting much more total and integrated human life is possible. For him, "[c]ities of millions of people do not provide a human code of existence and depend on a whole economic system which will eventually collapse."448 So it is clear that we will have to look beyond the industrialized cities to find the future of humanity, with some new systems of norm and meaning. His ideal is village life, which has lasted for thousands of years all over the world and still exists in most parts of the world.

            With great appreciation he quotes the setting of a Neolithic village . According to Lewis Mumford, a Neolithic village is a place:

 

            Where the seasons are marked by holiday festivals and ceremonies; where the stages of life are punctuated by family and communal rituals; where eating and drinking and sexual play constitute the central core of life, where work, even hard work, is rarely divorced from rhythm, song and human companionship and aesthetic delight; where vital activity is considered as great a reward of labor as the product; where neither power nor profit has precedence over life; where the family, the neighbor and the friend are all parts of a visible, tangible, face-to-face community. There the Neolithic culture in its elements is still in existence.449 

 

            It is clear for Griffiths that such a description of a village remains an inspiring model for human community today. Science and human innovations, based on appropriate technology, may introduce improvements especially to facilitate transport and communication, making it possible to link up different human centers. In such a village, it is conceivable that the sun is the prime source of energy , and also water and wind.450 So Griffiths cautiously approves technological innovations, but not at the cost of human beings.

 

 

 

 

The Psychological Aspect as the Bridge

 

            Coming to the psychological and social aspects of such a new humanity we see basically two areas: education and a holistic health care, which include also psychological and mental well-being.

            Education in such a future would be the basic education , as understood by Gandhi , for instance. It would be an integral education of body, soul and spirit, relating each one to the other and to the wider world in an organic way and at the same time developing each one's personal capacities. Following Rudolf Steiner's understanding , such an education would center first on the emotions, then on the imagination and finally on the rational.451 An integrated education of the whole person requires that the emotional, imaginative and rational be properly developed, consolidated and stabilized. Griffiths also plead for a new education system based on the values of Mahatma Gandhi.

            In the same manner, in medicine too, rather than making use of mostly allopathic methods, there will be a turn to alternative methods such as homeopathy, acupuncture, _yurveda, Tibetan medicine and herbal medicine, all of which are interrelated and beneficial for the total health of the whole person . Such an alternative method of treatment deals with the whole person and relates the body to the soul and to the spirit. It does not treat the body in isolation. Since health, wholeness and holiness are interrelated, bodily health is not the one-sided health of a one-dimensional man and woman.452 Bodily health leads to psy chologically and emotionally well balanced human beings. So the health of the body, the wholeness of the person and holiness in the spirit are all aspects of the same reality, and thus the psychological dimension is linked to the physical and to the spiritual.

 

The Spiritual Aspect as the Basis

 

            Turning to the spiritual aspect, the future would involve a return to perennial philosophy , which is actually the ancient wisdom which underlies all the religions of the world from the earliest times of humanity. It would imply that we would also respect the traditional wisdom of the primitive people, the aborigines and the tribals of various lands and continents. It is a positive sign that more and more people are discovering today this wisdom of the ancient people, the harmony that they achieved in their lives and the very deep understanding that they had of how human life is related to the natural world around them and the world of the spirits beyond them. Such people generally evidence an integrally holistic life.

            In such a view of the future, we turn to the great religious traditions of the world. Most of these traditions had their origin in the first millennium before Christ. All these religions, based on perennial philosophy , developed of course under different circumstances, and they all carry with them the ancient wisdom regarding the wholeness of life, in different ways and degrees. Each of them gives a particular and unique insight into the ultimate truth of reality . At times when these traditions encountered each other, there were rivalry, acrimony or conflict resulting in disastrous consequences. Such consequences could have been avoided for the advancement of the whole humanity.

            Referring concretely to Christians, they should at the same time recognize that the true Church has always been present in the history of humanity:453 "Wherever man awakes to consciousness and knows himself/herself in his basic intuitive consciousness as open to the transcendent mystery of existence, the power of the Spirit in him is drawing him/her to eternal life." The Church is men/women become conscious of their destiny as sons/daughters of God. In the biblical perspective Adam is humanity created in the image and likeness of God and we are called to be sons and daughters of God.

            When Adam sinned he failed to respond to the spirit and fell back on his limited time-bound nature. The upward evolution from matter through life and consciousness to eternal life in the spirit is stopped. At the same time the mystery of redemption began. A new power of the spirit entered creation and began to draw humanity back into the life of the spirit.

            In this sense the Church is present in humanity from the very beginning of history. Viewed thus a Christian can easily feel at home in the other religious traditions . Such a new vision is to be fostered for the future, where everyone will not be Christian, where Christianity will be open to all religions and where all other religions will have their own legitimacy and unique roles.

            With this new vision, we learn that all these different religious traditions are unique, interrelated and interdependent, in order to arrive at the final truth . The genuine encounter of the different religions would involve the recognition of the limited character of the individual revelations with a view to enlarge their own limited horizons .454 

 

REDISCOVERY OF THE FEMININE

 

            We can envisage the emergence of a new world culture as the present materialist and mechanistic system breaks down under the continued crisis of economic, social and political conflict. A very significant feature of the coming new world would be the re-emergence of the feminine characteristics.

            For about three thousand years the world has been dominated by patriarchal cultures which suppressed the previous matriarchal cultures.455 This masculine culture , with its aggressive, competitive, rational, analytic character has reached its peak. He adds further:456 "In the West today the masculine aspect, the rational, the aggressive power of the mind is dominant, while in the East the feminine aspect, the intuitive aspect of the mind prevails." Now is the time for the re-emergence of the feminine.

            Further, it must be noted that such a re-emergence is based on the assumption that man and woman are equal and complementary, not on the assumption that one is higher or superior to the other. Griffiths develops this thought:457 

 

            A woman does not become more equal to man by seeking to become like a man, but by revealing his opposite character. Yet it must be recognized that every man and woman is both male and female; reason and intuition exist alike in every human being, but in the man reason is dominant whilst intuition is prominent in the woman. In a perfect man or woman the marriage of these opposites takes place. Reason without intuition is intelligent but sterile; intuition without reason is fertile but blind. The woman who seduces man is the blind instinct which listens to the voice of the serpent, the animal intelligence or sexuality. The feminine mind, instead of being guided by reason so as to open itself to the spirit, thus achieving the marriage of reason and intuition, surrenders to animal instinct. The union of the male (reason) and female (intuition) gives birth to communion in the spirit and integration of the personality. Thus the serpent energy becomes the savior, as stated in St. John's Gospel : `As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life.' (John 3:14-15)

 

            What Griffiths advocates, further, is a marriage between the feminine and the masculine not only symbolically, at the level of reason and intuition, but also at the level of equality of rights and responsibilities. The future of the world depends on the `marriage' of these two minds, the conscious with the unconscious, the rational with the intuitive and the active with the passive. This `marriage' must take place first within the individual. Only then can external union take place. He is confident that this irreversible trend is actually taking place. Now we are moving into a new phase, where the feminine principle, that is the yin in contrast to the yang , will be valued. According to the Chinese understanding , when the yang, the masculine character, reaches its limit, it begins to move back to the yin, the feminine character. Griffiths further affirms: "We have now reached the limit of the yang, . . . and we are moving inevitably back to the feminine."458 So Griffiths claims that sooner or later, the feminine will begin to take over its own proper place, with its intuition, empathy, co-operation and with its more holistic approach. Such a move will necessarily affect not just the economic, social and political orders, but also religion and spirituality .

            Coming particularly to the Christian tradition , Griffiths laments that this tradition has developed an advanced masculine approach to God. We always speak of God as Father and of the incarnation of the Son. Even the Holy Spirit , which is neuter in Greek, is considered and talked of in masculine terms. But he reminds us that in the Old Testament, the Spirit, the Ruah ,459 is feminine, and in the Syrian Church this same word was used when they spoke of "Our Mother , the Holy Spirit."460 Such a formulation, which was common in the second and third centuries, unfortunately did not survive very long. Since then the masculine character of God has always prevailed. The feminine aspect could be found partly in the Old Testament and to a lesser extent the in New Testament . In the Christian tradition this trend was carried on only by exceptional people like Julian of Norwich and St. Anselm of Canterbury. By contrast, Griffiths affirms, in India God is conceived as both Father and Mother. Being neither masculine nor feminine, He/She can be represented as either Father or Mother or both. In the T_ntric tradition, which derives from the ancient matriarchal culture