CHAPTER THREE
TOWARDS AN ADVAITIC
UNIFICATION OF
EVOLUTION
The proceeding chapter examined the advaitic
vision of Griffiths seeing the need to synthesize the Eastern mystical elements
with those of the West. Proceeding further, in this chapter, we wish to see how
Griffiths himself undertakes his venture of unifying the diversity of human ex
perience
s
to form
one unifying view of the
cosmos and of human beings, including their religious beliefs, within the
perspective of Eastern religions, Christianity
and Western science
. We shall restrict ourselves
to Griffiths' own treatment of the topic. Hence, our procedure in this section
will be only expository. Critique or evaluation will follow later. Here the
emphasis is on understanding
and assimilating Griffiths'
own attempt at unifying and integrating reality
in the perspective of a
Totality. We shall follow his own process of thought, as elaborated in his A
New Vision of Reality (NVR). Our treatment is certainly limited in order to
span the whole evolutionary growth of the cosmos and of human consciousness
in this chapter.
Nevertheless, we make this bold attempt knowing well that we cannot do full
justice to the topic because our purpose of attaining a holistic
integration of the cosmos and
human beings demands that we undertake such an attempt, in spite of its inherent
limitations.
To begin we cite Griffiths as he formulates the goal of his own
enterprise. His aim is "to see how the whole process [of the evolution of
the world and of human consciousness
] converges on an Ultimate
Reality, a Supreme Being."264 It is important to note firstly,
that he includes the whole phenomena of the world as his starting point in order
to arrive at a convergence of the entire world in the Supreme Being. Secondly,
he himself affirms that "it is important to have some kind of plan in terms
of which to identify and unify our experience
. It is also important that
this unifying plan has a place for all the great religious traditions
."265 Here we
note again the human need to unify the totality
of our experience, which is
the goal of this book, as well. We shall attempt to do this within our advaitic
framework.
Again it must be stressed that what follows is not a rigid, watertight
system applicable for all times and situations. By its very nature it is open to
modifications and adaptations, for as he asserts, the final Reality is
unknowable. But this does not amount to skepticism. While it is hypothetical, it
is not arbitrary.266 It remains tentative, but is based on facts
available to us at present. Therefore, there is an element of certainty in it.
Moreover it presents a general outline or framework for reference. Thus he
affirms: "What follows is an attempt to articulate some kind of framework
in which all these modes of experience
can be related and seen in
their inner unity."267
Lastly, it must be emphasized that on his path to the evolution of
consciousness
and the unification of the
whole of reality
, he is basing himself firmly
on the findings of modern science and his Christian faith. In all his attempts
to find a unified
vision of the totality
of reality, he does not lose
sight of his basic Christian experience
of the resurrection
of the Lord. Thus a permanent
thread running throughout our discussion will be his question: "How do we
situate Christianity
in this context of
contemporary physics, psychology
and the mystical tradition
?"268
It is essential, however, that we keep in mind the fact that Bede was no
scientist specialized in contemporary physics or evolution. His writings can
never be considered scientific contributions. What he has done is to draw from
popular scientific writers and cull ideas and vision that he can put on the same
balance within his mystical framework. It would be a colossal blunder on our
part to see the writings of Griffiths as scientific treatise reflecting the
modern scientific worldview. First and foremost he is a mystic with an advaitic
vision of reality
. This mystical vision is
furthered and substantiated by the scientific and metaphysical visions.
PROCEDURE
Our procedure in this chapter is: first to situate our effort at unifying
the whole of reality
by presenting the picture of
this by modern science.269
Next, we shall look at the two divergent processes of prav
tti
and niv
tti,
the descending and ascending dynamics in the course of evolution. We follow
first the process of fragmentation or descending from the original unity as
evolution of conscience and as the fall. Then we shall look at the ascending
aspect or reintegration by studying the authentic origin and purpose of religion
and attempting to gain a holistic
vision of reality
. This process finds its
fulfillment
in the accent on the Godhead.
This aspect is dealt with in sections three and four.
Finally, we will make an effort to understand Griffiths' own effort at an
advaitic
or
unifying synthesis of the totality
of the reality
in the One, the Supreme. This
is done in the last section. It must be admitted that since there are no sharp
distinctions between the various sections some overlapping and repetitions are
unavoidable. Still our whole focus is on finding a unified
, interdependent web of
relationship
in the whole reality.
In short, we can say that after introducing reality
, we study the movement from
the initial integral oneness to fragmentation and then the movement back to the
Supreme. Then we see how this synthesis is attempted by Griffiths himself. It
must be noted that this whole movement to and from and this synthesis do result
in a radical change and a transformed newness. Our synthesis and return is not a
movement in vain, a repetition ad infinitum.
The process we follow to formulate a unifying advaitic
plan
of reality
could be divided roughly into
the three dimensions in Griffiths' own anthropology. At the first phenomenal
level of the physical world we try to understand materiality. At the second
psychological level, we look at the evolution of consciousness
and of the psyche. This
implies obviously that there is more to the phenomenal world than the merely
material. From there, we go on also to consider the subtle world, which has
largely been forgotten by modern men and women.270 The fall from Eden
and the origin of sin could also be studied at this psychological level. Moving
further to the spiritual dimension
, we see how the attempt is
made to unify and integrate our whole vision. It is basically the spiritual
dimension which would unify the whole reality leading us to a holistic
return to the Godhead. So the
final goal of unity in the totality
of the One is an advaitic
vision. It is a vision based on a healthy mystical or spiritual level, without
in any way denying the physical and psychological as we have already indicated
in the preceding chapter. It may be noted that these three divisions do not fit
exactly into our categories. There is an element of approximation in these
divisions.
THE PHYSICAL DIMENSION
Cosmic Origin: Of
course the natural starting point for such a venture would be the very origin of
the physical or material world.271 Griffiths accepts the theory of
the cosmic explosion
of matter
at the very beginning of
conceivable physical time, some fifteen billion years ago, as postulated by
contemporary physics.272 In that explosion, which the physicists call
the "Big Bang
"
it is thought that the forms of all matter which were to come to
be in the course of time "were all already implicated
, enfolded together, and that
these forms have gradually unfolded or become explicated in the course of the
evolutionary process."273 Actually going further than the
physicists, he extends this thought to include not just the form
of the matter but also the
form for the consciousness
as already implicated in the
original explosion
.
This implies that we have to conceive of a universe coming into being in
which matter
and consciousness
are interwoven. This concept
can be better understood in terms of the classical Aristotelian categories of
matter and form
.
Matter and Form
: Before
going further, a brief digression on form
and matter
is ap
propriate, since in and
through these two concepts we can visualize his whole understanding
of the process of evolution
of the material world as well as of consciousness
. As he himself admits, he
resorts to the classical Aristotelian definition of matter and form to
understand and to explain the origin and evolution of the cosmos and
consciousness. Matter is for him "the energy of the universe, an unformed,
unstructured energy, which is behind the whole universe," and form is
"the principle of order."274 So matter is indeterminate,
unpredictable, unintelligible and a pure flux
of energy without form.
Change, becoming, chance, absurdity and unpredictability follow from this
matter. As against this, form constitutes the principle of order, of structure,
of intelligibility and of being in actuality. So the pure potentiality of matter
is organized and actualized into being through the action of form on it.
Matter always tends to dissipate itself, to disintegrate, to become
disorganized, reminding us of the entropy principle of physics. As matter
expands beginning with the
Big Bang
the force of form
comes into play and begins to
structure matter, organizing and controlling it. Thus, from the beginning matter
became increasingly more organized as the two forces continuously operated,
matter disintegrating and moving outwards and form
drawing within, concentrating
and centering the matter.
Gradual Unfolding: The
whole universe from its very beginning evolved out of an interplay between these
two basic principles, matter
and form
. As part of this dynamics of
evolving we see the trend of matter to be always dissipating, disintegrating and
disorganizing.275 This is confirmed by the physicists' theory that at
the very beginning of the universe there was a primordial explosion
such that this matter was
thrown outward to primordial expansion. Later in the course of time, due to
evolutionary forces, complex life forms emerged and gradually developed.
This slow development of matter
into atoms, molecules and
then into cells, organisms and simple plants and then to complex animals276
is a gradual and continuous process. He notes: "What is particularly
interesting is that the elements of the particular stage, atoms, molecules,
cells and so on, are each a whole in their own right, and as they develop they
integrate the other wholes within themselves so that the universe is composed of
wholes within wholes."277 Taking the example of an atom or a
cell he asserts that even within the cell the molecules still retain their
"structure within the wider structure of the cell."278 So
he sees in nature "structures or processes built up one after another, one
into another, in such a way that nothing is lost."279
This evolutionary process follows mostly mechanical laws in the course of
evolution.280 This process goes on continuously through plants and
animals and reaches its climax in human beings.281
It appears that the same forces which are at work in matter
and sub-human life are
operative also in the human and conscious level. The principles of matter and
form
working together can account
for the theory of evolution and the emergence of consciousness
. Finally it has led to the
mind, "a pattern of self-organization and a set of dynamic relationships
."282 Form
creates order and enables self-organization and a set of dynamic relationships.
Human we are at that stage of consciousness
at which the material
universe emerges into consciousness in each one of us. The first level of
consciousness is that of global consciousness
, that is aware of oneself
being part of the physical universe. Later on this consciousness evolves to the
awareness of oneself as part of a human organization, of a human family and of
human relationships. It further develops to the level of self-consciousness
, leading to self-reflection
on oneself.
Slowly we begin to experience
ourselves as an integrated
whole. "Just as the structure of the whole human organism is present in
every cell, so the whole universe is present in each one of us and we become
conscious of the physical structure of the universe of which we are a
part."283 Even now we are in the process of evolving.
Scientific Evidence: Griffiths
tries to base his conclusions on modern physical, scientific and psychological
findings. Drawing from the studies of some of the eminent scientists of our
times, he tries to support his own conclusions on the interdependence and the
wholeness of the cosmic reality
. It would be interesting for
us to look at some of the sources
which justify his view of
reality as mutually interdependent and interacting.
The earlier classical physics with a mechanistic view284 of
the universe is, he holds, no longer defensible today. Although the scientists
who were the driving force behind the mechanistic view of the world themselves
were believers,285 their philosophy
could, and in fact, has led
to atheism. The eighteenth century could be characterized as "thoroughgoing
materialism
, . . . combined with
mechanism" which practically favored atheism. This mechanistic view was
later extended to include biology and even psychology
. The pioneer in psychology,
Freud, tried to explain the whole of the human person
in terms of mechanistic
causality.286 Largely he was successful in relating repression to
suppressed forces in the unconscious. Jung
287 broke with
Freud's view and discovered in the unconscious not only repressed forces of
emotion, but also creative principles which he called archetypes
.
In spite of this prevailing materialist philosophy
inherited from the eighteenth
century, there are other directions of development discernible in contemporary
physics288 and science which support "perennial philosophy
"289 and
Griffiths makes use of these trends to lend credence to his own theory of cosmic
interdependence. To cite him, "In physics, for instance, there has recently
been the discovery that the material universe is essentially a field of energies
in which the parts can only be understood in relation to the whole."290
He illustrates this using the case of electrons and their tunnelling
effect in quantum mechanics.291 This has been further corroborated by
physicist David Bohm
who in his book Wholeness
and Implicate Order has advocated the theory of the implicate order.
According to this theory, "The whole universe is originally implicated
, or folded up together, and
what we observe in the everyday world is the explicate order, i.e. that which
has been explicated or unfolded."292 Behind the continually
unfolding explicate order the implicate order is always present so that in one
sense the whole universe is implicated behind the explicated form
. His theory affirms in the
spirit of Einstein "a fundamental wholeness, interconnectedness and
intelligibility"293 of the whole cosmos, including human beings.
Again in the rapidly moving field of biology, the Cambridge biologist
Rupert Sheldrake has affirmed that "the attempt to explain the phenomena of
life in terms of physics and chemistry alone cannot ultimately succeed."
Rupert Sheldrake, in his A New Science of Life
:
The Hypothesis of Formative Causation, has put forward the theory of formative causation based
on the hypothesis of `morphogenetic fields'.294 This theory, as
opposed to the mechanistic views, introduces the concept of `morphic resonance'
and `formative causation.' "This means that each living or non-living
entity develops its particular form
as a crystal or organ or
plant or animal because it is within a particular morphogenetic field which is
structuring it, and which is in resonance with all similar organisms. The field
thus contains an inherent memory."295
This view of the cosmic interdependence is further corroborated by the
findings of Ilya Prigogine, a Russian-born Nobel Prize-winning physical chemist,
who discovered that within certain chemicals there are systems which he termed
"dissipative structures."296 These cells maintain their
order and develop it further by breaking down other structures in the process.
The entropy or disorder resulting from it is dissipated in the form
of waste products. The
self-organization within these chemical systems so resembles that of living
organisms that it has been suggested that they represent a link between
non-living and living matter
.297 Bede Griffiths
sees these ideas of how form
or field structures matter
as having some similarity to
the position of Teilhard de Chardin
.298
After studying the emerging view of the reality
in contemporary science
Griffiths formulates his own
thesis:299
We have, then, the new physics with its understanding
of the physical world as a
field of energies, an integrated whole in which the whole is present in every
part; we have the theory of morphogenetic fields, within which organisms have
been built up continuously and are developing continually into new forms. The
principle of formative causation, within specific morphogenetic fields, applies
to everything in the cosmos from the organization of the atom upwards, thorough
the molecule, the cell, the organ, the organism, the plant, the animal and the
human. With the advent of the human body that organizing power within begins to
become conscious. A human being is a form
of matter
which has reached a very high
order of complexity and is so organized as to become conscious. The breakthrough
takes place when matter and form, which have been working together, come into
consciousness
and we can become aware of
ourselves as a material organism with cells made up of matter from the first
matter of the universe. Each of us, in the cells of our body, is linked with the
original matter of the universe because the entire universe, and everything in
it, is one integrated whole. . . . We all have within ourselves the basic
structure of the physical universe and of life, but we also have this unique
awakening into consciousness. We can begin to control the matter of our bodies.
In conclusion we can hold that in every branch of Hinduism
there is this movement of the
cosmos300 emerging and returning to its center: the One. The result
of this movement is that the whole universe returns to God enriched by the
experience
of self-consciousness
.301 The difference
in the Christian position here is that everything that returns to the Father
returns through the Son and
the Spirit
and so comes back
transformed.302 But from a Hindu perspective, as we have already
hinted, we are all in that movement of prav
tti
and
niv
tti.
So everything comes forth from the Father in the Word
and everything is being drawn
back to the Father in the Spirit.
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSION
In the second section Griffiths studies the evolving growth of
consciousness
and mental faculty. This
section leads to the spiritual dimension
where full integration is
possible.
Evolution of Consciousness (Prav
tti)
The process of evolution that we have just hinted at in the preceding
section goes on continuously through plants and animals to human beings.
Griffiths infers from this that the "same forces which are at work in
matter
and in sub-human life operate
also in the human person
and in human consciousness
."303 This
makes him conclude that the same principles of matter and form
, which we have seen, can also
account for the evolution of humanity with its human consciousness
. What is special about human
beings, according to Griffiths, is that this organizing power or form
"begins to emerge into consciousness,"304 and in the case
of humanity it expresses itself as mind. Mind, it has been said, reveals itself
as "a pattern of self-organization and a set of dynamic
relationships."305 In this sense it can be said that mind is
present in matter from the beginning. In other words the mind which has
eternally been present, also in matter, plants and animals, becomes conscious in
human beings, as indicated already.306 Now we are at that particular
stage of evolution at which the material universe is emerging into consciousness
in each one of us. This he illustrates by referring to the study of Ken Wilber.
Griffiths says:307 "Ken Wilber has correctly diagnosed this
process of evolution. He has traced various levels of consciousness
and of unconsciousness in
each one of us. Beneath the conscious mind, there are many levels of the
unconscious too. By trance
or by hypnosis
it is actually possible to
get back to the level of prenatal experience
where the whole trauma of the
birth process can be relived and worked with."308 In our
treatment, we restrict ourselves to the emergence and growth of consciousness
. Tracing the process of human
evolution Wilber beautifully illustrates the whole process in his Up from
Eden.309 He distinguishes various levels in the emergence of
consciousness.310 We shall look at them briefly below:
1. Urobic/Oceanic Consciousness
: This
is the original state of human beings and is the primeval consciousness
in Eden where the human being
is totally immersed in nature and is one with it. Having no separate ego in that
state, it could be seen easily in the child floating in the amniotic fluid in
the mother. There is simply an experience
of immersion in a cosmic
whole, in which the material and the human world are experienced in a global
unity with the Spirit
which pervades and
encompasses them as a kind of bliss. This corresponds to the state in Eden since
man and woman in the paradise account were in that state of bliss-consciousness,
totally one with nature.
The term uroboric comes from Greek mythology, where the uroboros
is the serpent with its tail in its mouth and thus completely enclosed in
itself. So the child in the womb and primeval human being in nature is
completely enclosed in the world of nature, without any separation.
2. Typhonic/Vital Consciousness: Typhon is another mythological creature, half human being and half
serpent. Since its tail is no longer in its mouth, it has begun to transcend
itself, indicating the child begins to develop a body consciousness
and to transcend itself to
some extent. It is a state where the child has only "self-awareness of the
body but yet no self-awareness of the mind."311 It is like a
dream state since things are far less differentiated than in the actual waking
state. Time and space are not yet fully differentiated. In this period the
personal boundaries are not distinct, and there is the sense of flowing into and
merging with others. Hence this state is also referred to as a
"participation mystique" or "a mystical participation"312
It is also the world of magic, since in magic, too, there is no clear
distinction made between the outer and the inner world. This is the pre-logical
state of consciousness before the development of language, when life is totally
lived in the present. It is actually a world of the emotions, of full
participation.
3. The Verbal/Imaginative Consciousness
: This
stage is characterized by the development of language. Use of words as signs is
a remarkable breakthrough in the emergence of consciousness
and in communication,
enabling humankind to span time and space. So he says: "Language is the
beginning of the first stage of liberation."313 To
gether with it we have the
beginning of the sense of time and living in extended time. This corresponds to
the great change in economics from hunting (living in the present) to
agriculture (anticipating the future). At this stage there is the beginning of
the clear separation from the world around, and there is therefore the
possibility of controlling the world in turn. So while undifferentiated from the
world, early man and woman at this stage were molded by the environment. The
next step of the verbal membership level is that of mythical knowledge. Once
language developed, the awareness of the world around could be expressed through
symbols
and myths. They had a
different way of perceiving the reality
around them314 in
a world of imagination
, as compared to the previous
stage of the world of emotions.
This world of symbolic
imagination is typical in
what is known as "paleonlogical thought
." It is not fully
logical and operates largely with images and symbols
. In this mythological world,
there are no clearcut distinctions. Some spiritual insights have been
characteristic of this age. It is suggested that at this time language is
"paratactic and not syntactic."315 That means that clauses
were simply put together side by side without forming complex sentences and
therefore not using the language syntactically (e.g., as in a young child). Here
it was predominantly the right hemisphere of the brain which was operative.
This stage also corresponds to the stage where surplus of production
could be stored in anticipation for the future. Now it was truly possible to
live from year to year. As Karl Marx
has showed, here the economy
changed the outlook of the people and whole social structures. Now larger
communities sprang and developed rapidly (in the valleys of the Nile, the
Euphrates, the Indus and the Yellow River in China
). There was also a group of
people who had leisure and free time. So the art of painting, ideograms,
writings, alphabet, calendar and observation of the stars developed. Here gods
dominate all human concerns. At this stage there is an intensified consciousness
of the Great Mother
, since the separation from
the body consciousness is severely felt. At this stage conflicts arise out of
the suppression of feelings or as reaction against this Mother.
4. Mythical/Symbolic Consciousness
: A
later stage was the possibility of the development of knowledge through the use
of myths; this is symbolic
knowledge made possible
through language. The primitive people saw trees and stones, for instance,
differently than we do. There they saw themselves immersed in the totality
of the cosmos and bound by
the myths affecting them and the cosmos. This mythical consciousness
led to the development of
imagination
,
which then led to concrete operational thinking.
The world of symbolic
imagination is typical of
palaeological thought. This is thought operating with images and symbols
and not with logic. This is
the time of paratactic language as opposed to syntactic language, where clauses
are put together side by side. This was the time of deep religious insight.
5. Mental/Rational Consciousness
: At
the next stage, it became possible to go beyond mere words to logical thought
through language. It is thought that it was between 1000 BC and 600 BC when
logical thinking achieved a breakthrough enabling consciousness
to emerge. This is correlated
with the development of the brain and the consciousness of the self. Until that
time there was no consciousness of oneself as a separate individual; one
belonged to one's family, to one's tribe, to the world around. With the
development of the ego, one could control oneself and the world around.
This led to the myth of the hero. This is also the stage of the human person
's separation from nature
(patriarchal stage). It is, as already mentioned, the stage when consciousness
emerged as self-consciousness
. This is a considerable
advance and is correlated with the development of the ego. At this level the
concept of linear time began to dominate over that of cyclic time. This gives
rise to the slow evolution of historical316 consciousness. Further,
at this stage, the mind experiences
itself as different from the
body and there is danger of repression, and it is here that the so called
demonic forces come into play. The suppressed natural energies could be
experienced as demons or devils.317 A hostile force is
experienced within and, when repression continues, may be projected outside. It
may be noted that these experiences occur not merely in the individual soul, but
in the collective consciousness, so that they are experienced as cosmic forces.
Most of us live still in the level of mental consciousness. Stopping at the
mental, rational consciousness, with science and technology
seen as the highest
achievement, the ego is exalted and considers itself as the center. According to
Griffiths, the Western materialist philosophy
has contributed largely to
this arrested development and "most of Western science
and philosophy
is being kept down at this
level."318
6. Transmental/Transrational Consciousness
: It
is precisely at this level that the East has overtaken and "gone far
beyond"319 the West. In the fifth and sixth centuries BC there
took place in the East the breakthrough beyond mental consciousness
and beyond the ego to the
transegoic, transmental consciousness. Griffiths concludes that this "is
the supreme achievement of the human race,"320 when, beyond the
ego, we open ourselves to the transcendent.
Associated with this level are the subtle levels of consciousness
, the areas of siddhi
of special spiritual powers, the phenomenon of shamanism, the parapsychological
powers and the level of elemental spirits.
Differentiation and Integration. It must be noted that at every stage there is both differentiation and
transcendence
. As body consciousness
is differentiated from the
oceanic, then verbal consciousness from the body, mental consciousness from the
verbal, and so on; at each stage people not only differentiate from themselves
but also transcend the previous state. With transcendence there is increased
freedom, but there is also the need to integrate the former consciousness. When
this process of integration fails, problems arise. All too often the integration
fails due to various reasons. Modern people are experiencing these splits and
repressions to a tremendous extent, and the resultant disorders deep in the
psyche are the causes of the imbalance in modern society. Another risk is that
as the person
separates and gains mental
consciousness there is the danger of going back to the mother particularly at
the level of verbal consciousness. Or, looked at from another perspective, seeing
the brutality and destruction of Mother
Nature, the mother is
conceived as seeking to devour her children. Therefore, there arose many myths
where the mother is seen as the devourer of her own children and the hero is one
who escapes and rescues the children from their own mother. It is at this stage
that the offerings (which had probably begun at the typhonic stage) takes
a terrible turn to human sacrifice.321 In Bede Griffiths' opinion,
the phenomenon of war also comes up at this later stage.
According to Wilber there is "a spectrum of levels of consciousness
," from the basic oceanic
consciousness
through all the levels up to
the supreme consciousness. These different levels are hierarchically structured
in such a way that the lower is always integrated with the higher. At
every point of transcendence
there has to be
"differentiation from the previous level and integration with it."322