The National and Ethnic Cultures in a Globalizing World

 

Leon Dyczewski

Catholic University of Lublin

 

1. The ambiguity od globalization

The processes of globalization are most advanced in the fields of technology,  economy and  politics. Doubtless, a global European and worldwide culture, the popular culture is being formed too. If the processes of globalization proceed in such forms and at such a pace as till today, before two or three generations pass, the world will become boring and its only diversity will be a change of the place of living. A number of questions arise in connection with these statements: Does globalization  encourage or discourage forming personal and collective identity? Does the progressing globalization bring about annihilation of ethnic and national cultures? Will a great village really emerge, where everybody will think, dress and have fun in the same or similar way?

The researchers and many politicians demand the existence of a variety of cultures in the world. They suggest that every region, every nation, every ethnic group should cultivate their own cultural heritage and create their own culture. Hence, surrendering to the process of globalization Europe must be both united and varied. Preserving different cultures should maintain its wealth and its inner dynamism of development. Justification of these two tendencies is based on the following premises:

a. Globalization makes the world uniform and at the same time pluralistic. Pluralistic, because by facilitating mutual communication between nations and ethnic groups it shows their different values, cultural products and psycho-social states, even small local cultures are presented to the general public.

b. Globalization significantly loosens the strong relationship between nation and state, which has existed up to now; this process is taking place in most contemporary European states. It more and more distinctly shows that an ethnic group or a nation may exist even if they do not form a state. Their sovereignty is based on their own culture and the legislation of the European Union.

c. Globalization brings centres closer to the peripheries and vice versa. This is done first of all thanks to the development of the electronic media, tourism and emigration.

d. Globalization  loosens the relationship between individuals and their environment and introduces individuals in wider world.

Globalization also keeps buried many dangers, especially for the weak groups, nations, states. This is because in the globalization processes strong nations and states dominate with their political conceptions, their products and services. And economic advantage is soon followed by cultural domination.

However, if someone believes that the process of globalization is going to erase nations, ethnic groups or local communities, he is making a mistake. We can see that the more the globalization process is intensified, becomes universal and includes more domains, the stronger the tendencies become in great and small nations to maintain their own identity; the same can be observed in local communities. Defence mechanisms of their own cultural identity are triggered; however, although this is relatively easy for strong and great nations, weaker and smaller nations or ethnic groups have to make great efforts to maintain their cultural identity and constantly develop it. Still, they gain from it by the fact that particular members of the group realise their cultural identity more fully. Globalization leads some people towards cosmopolitanism, and some towards a more conscious cultural identity.

 

  1. Variety of cultures as a factor in individual development

The meeting various values, different ways of perceiving reality, different customs and products individuals continuously learn, evaluate and choose something new. In this way attaining a peculiar kind of independence from the environment they live in. Also with respect to the social-cultural groups they belong to they remain to a large degree autonomous. No group owns them completely and they are not just an element of the group but they always remain free members of it and may remain in it or leave it. They are externally independent and internally free. It can be said then that multiplicity of cultures is an important factor in the development of individuals’ both cognitive and volitive properties, which favours strengthening and experiencing their autonomy, at the same time giving them a chance to consciously experience their own cultural identity and personal dignity.

 

3. Multiplicity of cultures as a factor in cultural development of particular societies

This statement is clearly seen when a society, for some political reasons, is separated from other cultures, or its contacts with other cultures are drastically limited, or they are selectively regulated. In this situation it looses the dynamism of its development or the development is not versatile. It remains an undeniable fact that many elements of  culture of each society, generally considered as typically own, come from other cultures. Every society oscillates between two tendencies: of keeping together and doing everything after its own fashion on the one hand and following others on the other. These two tendencies have to be kept in balance, or proportional dynamism. If the first tendency wins, the society loses dynamism of its development; if the latter is the dominant one – the native culture grows weaker.

The uniting of Europe cannot be a process of levelling cultural differences. Unity does not mean uniformity. Multiplicity of cultures is requires by: a. Europe’s culture, and b. the federal character of the future Europe.

Ad a. Although unity of Europe postulates acceptance by all Europeans of the same fundamental values, norms, ideas, and a common vision of the future, which is manifested in enacting common law, creating a common currency, a common education system, it assumes a variety of situations and forms of its realisation. It also assumes different ways and means of satisfying fundamental needs, laws, beliefs, customs, events, experiences, impressions and desires. Moreover, ever-bigger groups of people come to Europe with completely different cultures. Hence in the united Europe the multiplicity of cultures which occurs there, is a manifestation of its spiritual wealth and a lasting factor in the development of particular cultures as well as of the all-European culture.

Ad b. The federal system at which Europe aims, assumes existence of various nations, ethnic groups and states with their own cultures. They have the right to further shape it, as culture secures their cohesion, identity, lasting existence and development. The right to have its own culture is the same fundamental right of every nation, of every ethnic group, as an individual’s right to live and develop. This is why sovereignty of culture should be guaranteed to every ethnic group, to every nation, as it is in culture that their members express their perception of themselves and the world, their experiences and talents, strivings and aspirations, and also their inner bonds.

Thus it is in the individual and social, national and international interest that apart from ours, other cultures should exist, both on the international scale and within the same state community.

4. Multiplicity of cultures on an inter-state scale

Stressing the sovereignty of culture of every ethnic group and of every nation in Europe is not a manifestation of separatism or nationalism, but it is the understanding of the essence of cultural wealth, because “all the cultures are part of humanity’s common heritage”.  And everything should be done so that no culture falls out of this heritage. In order to make sure that sovereignty and development are guaranteed many principles should be adhered to. Here are some of them:

a. Rejection of the division of cultures into superior and inferior, developed and undeveloped, rich and poor ones. In relation to other cultures an attitude of respect and positive openness is necessary. It helps to notice common elements as well as elements that are valuable in other cultures, which facilitates contacts, exchange and co-operation.

b. Love towards one’s own culture and a sense of its importance, however, without megalomania.

c. Dialogue with other cultures

d. Exchange and mutual creativity instead of domination, absorption and polarization.

e. Institutionalisation of mutual relations

 

5. Multiplicity of cultures in the scale of one country

Even if we relatively easily agree to multiplicity of cultures on the international scale, on the scale of our own country questions and doubts arise. However the mono-cultural model in a modern state is theoretically rejected, but in practice it occurs.

The multicultural model appeals to the minds that accept the right of individuals and social groups to their own distinct character and autonomous actions. It appeals to minds that can create far-reaching visions of development and form unity out of multiplicity. As characteristic features of multiplicity of cultures within one country the following can be mentioned:

a. Different cultural groups live having the same rights; they compliment one another and stimulate one another to develop. In everyday life the same individuals, belonging to their own cultural group, also participate in other groups’ culture.

b. Culture of the society that develops on the base of the multicultural model in some respects has a relatively open character and in some a relatively closed one toward other cultures. This is accompanied by a relatively great interest in other cultures, usually chosen ones, and accepting various elements from them relatively easily.

c. The cultural policy of a multicultural state assumes the form of patronage, and not one of supervision and administration. State authorities  do not identify themselves with any cultural groups in the sense that they do not choose one of them to be the national, obligatory or privileged one. They also do not ignore or disregard any of them. They act as a mediator between different cultural groups. The patronage of the state patronises any valuable forms of creativity that have various aspirations; it also allows any other patrons – individuals or groups – to act.

d. Treating culture non-instrumentally. The ruling groups do not treat culture as a tool for propagating their own ideology, and the more so for strengthening their power or the power of their party.

The basis for the formation of an overall cultural system of a given state society is acceptance of a definite group of values, ideas, norms, behaviour patterns, cultural products, historical events and hero-figures important for that society by its members, that is by all the cultural groups. Experiencing a common history and common vicissitudes occurs here. It becomes the basis for establishing institutional frames of culture, for formation of common centres that will co-ordinate and plan the cultural development. In a multicultural situation the society is not divided into various parts but is a varied whole, a rich unity in multiplicity, and hence it is a multi-factor environment where its members can develop.

 

 

6. Conclusion

The problem of the keeping and development of own national and local culture and a connection it with a wider culture is not a novelty for a small societies and weak states. It emerged quite clearly during the period their occupation or partition. For example, it is not a new problem for Irelands, Hungarians, Poles, Slovaks. For Poles it emerged quite clearly during the period when Poland was partitioned. Poles, living on their own land, were citizens of foreign states or had to emigrate to other countries. It was then that the Polish elite already held the view that in the world of culture it is necessary to merge what is local with what is European and universal. Precisely this attitude was expressed by poetry and political leader Adam Mickiewicz when he characterised Joachim Lelewel, writer and politician, in the following couplet:

“And so, wherever you turn, you will always show

  That you come from the Niemen bank, that you’re a Pole, inhabitant of Europe”.

And Lelewel himself advised the Polish Parliament in 1831 to be able to “associate the past and the future, to join what is Polish with the tendency of the age”, that is Polish national culture with the culture of Europe and of the world. This postulate is still topical for Poles and for others.

A modern European needs both European culture and national culture. Breathing with these two lungs and creating both these cultures forms creative, open and individual personalities.

 

 Rome, 27.07.2003