COMMENTARY

 by Magdalena Dumitrana

Bucharest, ROMANIA

 

It is amazing how, the entire human action, on whatever plane or level of discussion, tends toward orderliness and intelligibility. Even the most ineffable human processes seem to succumb under the human temptation to define and classify. Imagination is one of these processes. The symbol is one of these products. They are quite different phenomena, however both situated at the junction between subjectivity and objectivity. The hope is that that using imagination, the seeker may find a way to the

 -true nature and

- true meaning of the symbol.

The finality of this quest is to recuperate the general meaning of life.

 Everything seems to be fine so far. Only two questions perhaps, related to the text, need some answers.

 ۰ The first one is: How, discovering the real nature of a symbol, can help for example, a philosopher to create a better philosophy? It seems that a symbol cannot ever have an   “objective” nature. Its functioning itself is address to the “subjective” capacity of reception, for only this one is able to understand what a symbol wants to communicate. The search itself for the nature of the symbol is subjective: if a philosopher has elected the Reason as the president of his weltanschauung, nothing will stop him to see the symbols as children of this presidency. It goes the same for a “subjective” philosopher or for the positions in between.

 Therefore again the question is there, waiting for a response: How could a human being, essentially subjective, whatever his/her beliefs and external fulcra are, reach the truth concerning the nature of a symbol? But even so, what useful this discovery will be for one’s self-enrichment?

 ۰ The second question(s).The discovery of the symbol nature leads necessarily to: is this the true nature/meaning of the symbol?

 No doubt, every symbol was (almost) fully understood or at least, followed by people as an attempt of harmonizing, in its own epoch. But the question does not concern this understanding, not even if it was or not appropriate. The search for a symbol meaning starts also when this meaning is lost, leaving behind only the sign; it develops throughout histories, looked and judged from another time and space. The motivation is strong, the stake is important. As prof. McLean pointed out, the study of the symbol could reveal ourselves - as individuals as well as nations, our own identities. Therefore, the urgency of the task is understandable, as we find ourselves on the edge of a potential dangerous subjectivity/objectivity situation threatening the being as a whole and as an individual.

Therefore, reaching the forgotten meanings of the symbols could be perceived as a way to rediscover the forgotten traditions ( which is actually happening) in order to find strength and sense in the present world experience.

 Still, we have here some (almost) insurmountable obstacles. Naturally, an old symbol can be misunderstood if it is seen  from a much less old position. Seconds and thirds mistakes will occur also when the symbol is analyzed inside of  particular fields: philosophy, literature, art, psychology and so on. Even more, at times, the symbols and their contents are stolen , distorted or reversed, making the original worthless, even a source of opposite meanings. This is the case for the Swastika,  the Hindu symbol, of which meaning - the eternal nature of the Brahman, the omnipresence of the Absolute was taken over by Nazis, becoming , at least in the European eyes, a fascist emblem. Something similar happened with St. Paul’s concept of the New Man, “borrowed” (as many others Christian concepts), by the communist ideology which promoted it as an expression of the complete Socialist personality. These “loans” seem to be a habit in the programmed actions attempting to remove the spirituality from people’s lives.

 On the whole, however, the results of the search for symbol meanings could be spectacular, feeding new trends and nurturing personalities in philosophy, arts and so on. Still, discovering different significances seems to be just another aristocratic exercise of mind, but not the path to follow for truth. But if we are not mistaken, the final target is precisely this one: to discover the only meaning of the symbol, that is, to discover the truth.

 Every generation has its own discoverers of the Truth. But it remains always a simple subjective acquisition, from time to time shared by believers within a religion; what a irony: to be able to touch the objective reality only by a very subjective grasp. That is why the truth, revealed in history, now and then by strong spiritual personalities, remains actually a secret, hidden in symbols, metaphors and parables. That is why also, the quest of truth will have an end only in the end of the human history. Otherwise, the danger of the objectification of faith -as a phenomenon generally accepted as overcoming the individual differences leading to the same genuine and  single reality, is strongly counteracted  by the proclamation of a new God, ruling our times, the Relativity. This divinity, propagated by economic-ideological and power interests has the function to stop the individual consciousnesses to become aware by their common nature.

 Being given these objective obstacles, it seems that there is one way of advancement throughout symbols: the imagination. The imagination - not as a philosophical, literary, psychological process, but as a spiritual tool.  The imagination is close related to the intuition. Both are psychological “wings” leading to invisible zones of the culture. Rationalism or subjectivism in philosophy, mathematics, techniques - both are supported  and stimulated by imagination and intuition together. The third element, necessary for a spiritual functioning, is the faith. Achieving the triad : faith-imagination-intuition, a man can have the hope to reach a glimpse of truth. Of course, this solution is deeply unsatisfactory for the seekers of the ultimate truth in the objective matter, which they use to equalize to the reason. But, as prof. McLean says closing his paper,, “all is purposive”, so, the wrong ways could lead, in conformity with His Reason, Will and Love, to the right path ahead.